Newton's and Fresnel's Diffraction Experiments
The Continuation of Newton's Diffraction
Experiments
Diffraction of Light at Slit and Hindrance
Interference-Angle Condition, Diffraction and
Imagery
Diffraction One After Another and with
Intermediate Imagery
Diminishing of Frequency of Light after
Diffraction
Inner and Outer Diffraction-Fringes at
Circular Openings
Superposition of Interference and Diffraction
Diffraction Experiments with Inhomogeneous
Illumination
Experiments with Polarized Light at Slit and
Double-Slit
The Background of Diffraction-Figures
Trial for Interpretation of Newton's Diffraction
Experiments
Consequences for Photons out of Newton's
Diffraction Experiments
Consequences for Structure of Electrons out of
that of Photons
The Thermally Conditioned Electromagnetic Field
Diffraction and Light-Emission of Electrons
Energy-Steps of Electrons in Magnetic Eigen-Field
Faraday's Electro-tonic States
Near-Field Optics with Regard to Newton's
Diffraction-Experiments
Consideration of Magnetic Moment of Electron
in Quantum Theories
german
Diffraction and Light-Emission of Electrons
Already Newton had proved in his diffraction experiments that light never can be a wave and he excluded indeterminism. For establishment of diffraction is offered the photon with structure and its field their interaction causes a change of direction by hindered field with use of vortex-dynamics. This is transferable on other particles by consideration that at photons determine their frequency the diffraction-figure and at other particles their velocity. If electrons change their velocity or direction, then can be tied off field-lines analogous Hertz's dipole emission, and then photons can be emitted.
.....
Discussions
In the discussion between Bohr and Einstein was considered Bohr as victor. But Einstein could prove his refuse opinion against the dualism of wave and particle (Einstein [31]: fusion of wave and particle) and indeterminism (Einstein [32]: God does not dice) to Heisenberg-Bohr's quantum-theory if he had recognise the importance of Newton's diffraction experiments. Moreover, Einstein [33] 1934 had written a foreword to Newton's optics, but the third book had obviously devoted no attention to him. Newton had not put out the observations 5 and 10 for he could not foresee Fresnel's simplifications or suppressions. Also he did not use his diffraction experiments for interpretation of nature of light. Einstein had to experiment in order to find Fresnel's inadmissible and wrong extrapolation with help of Newton's observation 5 and 10. But at that time he could not give an alternative. This was possible first about 1960 after acknowledgement of structure of elementary-particles. Already Broglie introduced with the photon with the guidance-wave, what Born corrected in guidance-field, the possibility of self-interaction (but he did not term it so). However, now it is possible to carry on the opinion of Einstein.
The optimism to this already Laue [34] had given, when he wrote (translated): " ... For the author shines no smaller the difficulties to unit jointly particle- and wave-introductions for the same object. ... But the necessary unity of both introductions remains moreover an unrealised demand to the theory. One do not say this difficulty were invincible on principle. In an interpretation of every experiment is involved already theory."
This theory here resulted only from suppression of Newton's diffraction experiments.
References
[1] I. Newton, Opticks, or a Treatise of the Reflexion, Refractions, Inflexions and Colours of Light. London 1704; Opera qua exstant omnis, Tom IV. London 1782; Optics. Reprint, Bruxelles 1966; Optik II + III, Übers. W. Abendroth, Ostwald's Klassiker Nr.97. Engelmann, Leipzig 1898. Neuauflage Bd. 96/97, Vieweg, Braunsschweig 1983; Optique, Trac. J. P. Marat 1787; Reproduction Bourgois, Paris 1989.
[2] A. J. Fresnel, Oeuvres Complétes I. Paris 1866; Abhandlungen über die Beugung des Lichtes. Ostwalds KIassiker Nr. 215, Engelmann, Leipzig 1926.
[3] H. Nieke, Newtons Beugungsexperimente und ihre Weiterführung. Halle 1997, Comp. Print 1, Arbeit 1; (Vorhanden in vielen deutschen Universitätsbibliotheken) Newton's Diffraction Experiments and their Continuation. Halle 1997, comp. print 2, paper 1. (Available in some university libraries).
[4] N. Bohr, Atomphysik und menschliche Erkenntnis I u. II. die Wissenschaft Bd. 112 u. 123, Vieweg, Braunschweig 1958 u. 1966. Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. Wiley, New York 1958.
[5] As [3], paper 12.
[6] A. Sommerfeld, Vorlesungen über theoretische Physik, Bd. II, Mechanik der deformierbaren Medien. Akad. Verlagsges. Leipzig 1945, S. 153 - 156.
[7] A. Sommerfeld, Atombau und Spektrallinien. Bd. II. Vieweg, Braunschweig 1960. Gleichungen (I.1.5) und (I.6.9a); Atomic Structure and Spectral Lines. Methuse, London 1923, 1930, 1934. Equations (I.1.5) and (I.6.9a).
[8] A. O. Barut, Z. Naturforsch. 32 a (1977) 362.
[9] L. de Broglie, La Physique quantique restera-t-elle indéterministe? Gauthier-Villars, Paris 1953; Phys. Bl. 9 (1953) 486, 541.
[10] As [3], paper 14.
[11] E. Mach, Die Prinzipien der physikalischen Optik. Barth, Leipzig 1921, S. 185 - 226. The Principles of Physical Optics. New York 1926.
[12] H. Boersch, Naturwis. 28 (1940) 711.
[13] J. Hiller a. E. Ramberg, J. Appl. Phys. 18 (1947) 48.
[14] C. Malange a. J. Gronkowski, phys. stat. sol. (a) 85 (1984) 389.
[15] As [3], paper 6.
[16] M. Laue, Materiewellen und ihre Interferenzen. Akad. Verlagsges., Leipzig 1948.
[17] J. M. Cowley, Diffraction Physics. North-Holland, Amsterdam, New-York, Oxford 1981.
[18] D. Bohm: Phys. Rev. 85 (1952) 160; 87 (1952) 389.
[19] F. Chew, Science 161 (1968) 762; Physics Today 23 (1970) 23.
[20] H. A. Lorentz, In: Encyclopädie der mathematischen Wissenschaften. V. Band, 2. Teil, Teubner, Leipzig 1904 - 1922. S. 188.
[21] P. M. A. Dirac, Die Prinzipien der Quantenmechanik. Hirzel, Leipzig 1930 S. 14; The Principles of Quantum Mechanis. Clarendon Press, Oxford 1935, 1947, 1958.
[22] As [3], paper 5.
[23] H. Hönl, Erg. ex. Naturwissenschaften 26 (1952) 291, Zitate S. 297, 335, 347, 351, 293.
[24] C. S. Adams, Contemp. Phys. 35 (1994) 1.
[25] Y. Aharonov a. D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 115 (1959) 485.
[26] Y. Imry a. R. A. Webb, Sc. Am. (USA) 1989 April 36; Spectr. Wiss. 1989 Juni 88.
[27] W. Duane, Proc. Nat. Sci. Wash. 9 (1923) 158.
[28] A. Landé, Ann. Physik (7) 33 (1976) 88.
[29] Hertz, Ann. Physik (III) 36 (1889) 1; Ges. Werke Bd. II, Barth, Leipzig 1892, S. 147. Electric waves. Transl. D. E.Jones, Macmillan, London 1893.
[30] As [3], paper 13.
[31] A. Einstein, Phys. Z. 18 (1917) 121.
[32] M. Born: Albert Einstein - Hedwig - Max Born - Briefwechsel. Nymphenburger, München 1969, S. 118, 226. The Born - Einstein Letters. Walker, New York 1971.
[33] As [1], Reprint from the fourth edition 1730 (with a Foreword by Albert Einstein and an Introduction by Sir E. T. Whittaker) 1934.
[34] As [16], S. 401.
© 2006 by tediamedia • info@gebeugtes-licht.de